Queen Elizabeth I and Lord Robert Dudley
Robert Dudley was her dearest friend during turbulent times. you mean that Akbar was the contemporary of Queen Elizabeth 1 of England?. Elizabeth never forgot the help that Robert Dudley had given her and rewarded his loyalty when she became Queen. Their relationship became closer and. Learn the facts about Queen Elizabeth I and Lord Robert Dudley. of the Privy Council; The Death of Amy Robsart; The relationship between Dudley and the Queen Robert Dudley was famous as the court favourite of Queen Elizabeth I.
He was now technically free to marry Elizabeth, but the cloud of suspicion that now hung over him meant that she could never accept him. To do so might have cost her the throne. Yet she would not let him go. She even hatched a scheme to marry him off to Mary Queen of Scots — on condition that the pair lived with her at court.
She also mollified him with the gift of Kenilworth Castle in and with the title Earl of Leicester a year later. After she evaded his outright proposal at Christmashe left court in a sulk, only to be dragged back and ordered never to leave her again.
But now he was turning to others. In he may even have secretly married a beautiful widow, Lady Sheffield the validity of this marriage has never been confirmedwith whom he certainly had a son.
Meanwhile, Elizabeth and Robert continued their bickerings and reconciliations. But it was rained off. She also enjoyed swearing profusely. Where's the real proof? Yes, they were close. Yes, she was possessive and jealous and wanted him as her friend, companion and plaything.
Were Elizabeth I And Robert Dudley Lovers?
But none of this means that she ever crossed the line from emotional adoration to physical lust. Historian Christine Hartweg, who wrote a biography of Dudley's father and knows the Tudor stories better than most, admits that "we can ever be sure about whether Elizabeth and Robert Dudley were lovers in any physical sense".
Interestingly, Hartweg also recounts how "Elizabeth is reported to have said, when she believed herself to be dying, that she had always loved Robert Dudley, but had never done anything improper with him. But this just goes to show how hazy all the details of their apparent courtship are. Can we really trust the snippets that have fallen to us through time? And let's also reconsider the relationship itself. Lest we forget, Elizabeth and Dudley were actually childhood friends.
They were school pupils together, in fact, breeding a closeness that would one day lead Elizabeth to describe Dudley as "another ourself". Is it not possible that they were in many ways TOO close? Could the fact they knew each other from such a young age mean their love was too sibling-like for comfort?
Queen Elizabeth I, Steven van der Meulen, circa Spouses could not attend court or official matters of State, therefore, Amy was never around when Elizabeth and Robert were together.
Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester (c) : Page 1
Some have also suggested that Elizabeth warned Amy to stay away or risk some kind of retribution. Meanwhile, Amy Dudley was dealing with the onset of depression. Amy allegedly convinced herself that her breast cancer was terminal. Sunday, September 8,was a day of celebration. It was only when the servants returned that they found the body of Amy Dudley laying at the foot of the stairs with a broken neck and a pair of deep wounds. Given how and where they had found her, plus the injuries that she suffered, it was only natural to conclude that death occurred by means of an accident or misadventure.
However, some strange contradictions immediately challenged this logical conclusion. The pair of lacerations were in this report but no other injuries. This is enough for some people to doubt that her death was merely an accident.
There is some evidence of possible jury-rigging going on behind the scenes. Dudley was rumored to have given Robert Smith, the jury foreman, a substantial quantity of velvet for tailoring.
The new widower also requested a jury of discreet men. One of the jury members who went by the name of John Stevenson was an employee of Dudley. Poison was a consideration alongside divorce. Some even went as far as to claim that Dudley and Elizabeth had as many as five children together. Maybe some or all of these rumors were silly or idle gossip. Like his father before him, Dudley was intent on gaining as much power and influence that he was able to.
Perhaps this was unacceptable to someone who went too far and decided to take matters into his own hands. If this was the case, then who could that someone be? A common trend among Heads of State is to have a circle of trusted individuals who oversee various political duties. Elizabeth was no different and would often seek the advice of the most loyal of all loyal subjects.
Did Queen Elizabeth Murder the Wife of Robert Dudley?
Fewer were more loyal than Robert, but that could have posed a problem of its own. Perhaps some members of the Privy Court managed to persuade the Queen that a relationship with Dudley was not best for the nation. This cloak and dagger plot and counterplot might have been a ruse to get Elizabeth to play some role in the death of Amy Dudley in order to drum up a scandal that would discredit Robert.
According to the Wikipedia entry Elizabeth I of England: Elizabeth seriously considered marrying Dudley for some time. However, William Cecil, Nicholas Throckmorton, and some conservative peers made their disapproval unmistakably clear.
There were even rumours that the nobility would rise [up] if the marriage took place. Outright execution or injury could ultimately end up causing more harm than good.
- Queen Elizabeth and Robert Dudley – the real story
- Robert Dudley, 1st Earl of Leicester
By engineering an outcry of this magnitude, Elizabeth may have proven at an early stage of her sovereignty that she was the astute politician that history remembers. Did Robert Do It? Any modern investigation into a death that has suspicious overtones to it will always begin with the immediate family or relatives. The police would have to determine the type of person that the victim was and do as much research into that person as possible.
From there, the investigation would focus on those closest to the victim. In Tudor times, there was hardly a police force worthy of the name, but there were still professionals who dedicated themselves to this purpose.