‘Thou Art My Warrior’: Questions of Alliegance and Power in Coriolanus and Homeland | Not You Will
'The key relationship is not that between Coriolanus and. Volumnia, or Coriolanus and Aufidius, but Coriolanus and the plebs.' Discuss. Would you agree. Coriolanus is known as Shakespeare's “political” play, as at its core are the questions This relationship only becomes more fractious, and after Coriolanus has . has been banished from Rome and prepares to meet with Tullus Aufidius. and find homework help for other Coriolanus questions at eNotes. the characters of Coriolanus and Aufidius as well as their relationship with each other.
Significantly, once Brody becomes reintegrated into society and embraces his celebrity identity somewhat, through television interviews and public appearances, the memory of war impacts upon him in a different, more destructive, way through his increasing sense of inertia, observed predominantly in the relationship with his wife, Jess.
The destruction of this stereotypical power couple is one of the narrative elements of Homeland that evokes Coriolanus most strongly, frequently engaging in the technique of presenting individuals in ideal situations or locations that mask their discontent. But that was beyond me. I was fucked up when I left for Iraq. As a result, the character of Brody represents not only the conflict between a wife who values his safety, alongside those who prioritise the status of his masculinity, but also evokes the power struggle between America and the Middle-East, who are both trying to acquire him as an asset.
Like Coriolanus, an outcast from Rome, offering his services to his enemy, Aufidius, when Brody is similarly rejected by his family and his country, he too seeks solace with the enemy. Thus, Carrie can be seen as analogous with the character of Aufidius. My action this day is against such domestic enemies — the Vice-President and members of his National Security team, who I know to be liars and war criminals.
Brody has no love for the political establishment that attempts to recruit him as its candidate. Like Coriolanus, he idealises his purer role within the military and believes in a cause above the machinations of government, who disgust him still further by engaging in drone strikes, a remote type of warfare which he looks down on as an unworthy, indirect form of combat. In spite of his faults, Coriolanus does not deserve such treatment, and in this episode he is largely an innocent victim.
The tribunes have wielded power without an awareness of the possible consequences. They are set to become the victim of their own plotting when Coriolanus plans to attack Rome with Aufidius.
This turn of events makes their political scheming redundant. They are only saved by the intervention of Volumnia, whose victory, ironically, means the downfall of her son for breaking his word to the Volscians.
Coriolanus's humiliating death in an enemy city is partly due to the tribunes' banishing him, but it is equally due to his decision to obey Volumnia rather than honor his agreement with the Volscians.
Thus, Coriolanus's downfall is partly due to the tribunes' scheming, but partly due to his own personality and decisions. The tribunes could not have succeeded in their plots if Coriolanus were a more moderate, more integrated man. Analyze Coriolanus's relationship with his mother Volumnia.
In a world where women were viewed as subservient to men and were expected to spend their time in such feminine pursuits as sewing and music, Volumnia has found an outlet for her fierce ambition and pride: She has brought Coriolanus up to be a great warrior, and is so hungry for his fame that she looks forward with eagerness to his acquiring new battle wounds. She tells Virgilia that if he were ever to be killed in battle, she would take comfort in his heroic reputation.
Coriolanus, for his part, is utterly dominated by Volumnia. He twice betrays his own sense of duty and integrity, and both times, it is under the influence of his mother.
On the first occasion, ambitious for her son to be consul, she persuades him to flatter the plebeians and pretend a humility he does not possess, in order to gain their votes.
Coriolanus knows that such pretence is against his nature, but he bends to her will. On the second occasion, after Coriolanus has allied himself to Aufidius, Volumnia persuades him not to attack Rome.
Coriolanus again does as she tells him, thereby betraying his alliance with the Volscians and his duty as a military commander. Again, as he does Volumnia's will, he is aware of the fatal seriousness of his self-betrayal. In relation to his mother, this otherwise almost invincible warrior has remained immature, a child.
When Aufidius attacks him as a "boy of tears" V. It is emblematic of Volumnia's dominance over her son that it is she, not Coriolanus, who is hailed as the savior of Rome after she persuades him not to attack the city.
He, in contrast, must return to Corioli to give an account of his actions to the Volscians, where he is killed by the envious Aufidius's band of Conspirators, and Aufidius treads on his corpse.
Volumnia survives, and it is tempting to speculate that she would "dine out" on her son's reputation for years to come. Analyze the role of the plebeians in the play.
AP English Literature - Contractions in Coriolanus and Aufidius’ Encounter
Coriolanus is set at a time in history when Rome was in transition from a monarchy to a republic. The plebeians were engaged in a power struggle with the traditional rulers, the patricians. This situation was reflected in the struggle between monarch and Parliament in England during the reign of King James Iwho was monarch at the time Shakespeare was thought to have written Coriolanus. Hence the plebeians' behavior in the play comments on political events in Shakespeare's time.
The plebeians are portrayed as fundamentally good-hearted, as they are at first willing to overlook Coriolanus's pride in respect to his reputation as a war hero. However, they are also portrayed as irrational, dangerously fickle, and incapable of thinking for themselves. Influenced by the manipulations of the tribunes, Brutus and Sicinius, they are easily persuaded to withdraw their support of Coriolanus and are soon demanding his death.
Then, when news comes of an imminent attack on Rome by Coriolanus and the Volscians, they claim that they never wanted him banished. The Volscian citizens are similarly fickle, first hailing Coriolanus as a hero after he makes peace with Rome, and then, under the influence of Aufidius's Conspirators, crying out for his death. The overall impression of the plebeians is that they are unfit to govern.
This is also true of their representatives, the tribunes Brutus and Sicinius. They are cynical, self-serving men whose chief concern is to escape the consequences of their actions, as when they tell the plebeians to falsely inform Coriolanus that they, the tribunes, were on his side all along. More importantly, when the Volscians are preparing to attack Rome, neither the tribunes nor the plebeians have any solutions, having banished the one person who could have helped them - the great soldier, Coriolanus.
However, in line with the ambiguities of the play, it is possible that the plebeians do their class a great favor when they banish Coriolanus. Given his excessive pride and contemptuous attitude to the plebeians, it is difficult to see how he could be anything but a disastrous consul who would only increase divisions between the patricians and plebeians.
But if the plebeians do right by themselves in getting rid of Coriolanus, it is more by accident than considered judgment, which they are never seen to exercise.
Analyze the relationship between Coriolanus and Aufidius. At the beginning of the play, Coriolanus and Aufidius are sworn enemies, though each admires the other. They are both great generals and committed to martial valor, but Aufidius is not Coriolanus's equal: This rankles with Aufidius.
NovelGuide: Coriolanus: Essay Q&A
In Act I, scene x, after his fifth defeat at Coriolanus's hands, Aufidius swears that should they meet again, one of them will die, and that he will get revenge by any means, fair or foul. This foreshadows Aufidius's eventual decision to betray Coriolanus. When Coriolanus is banished from Rome, he throws himself on Aufidius's mercy and offers to ally himself with his former enemy against his birth land.
Aufidius is moved, and his hostility turns to an intense love and submissive adoration of Coriolanus, with a strong homoerotic undertone. This element of erotic fascination gives an air of precarious instability to this alliance, which, it seems, may only last as long as Aufidius's infatuation.